Angelesverdes

Overview

  • Founded Date September 23, 1941
  • Posted Jobs 0
  • Viewed 7

Company Description

Generative Artificial Intelligence

Improvements in transformer-based deep neural networks, particularly large language designs (LLMs), allowed an AI boom of generative AI systems in the early 2020s. These consist of chatbots such as ChatGPT, Copilot, Gemini, and LLaMA; text-to-image artificial intelligence image generation systems such as Stable Diffusion, Midjourney, and DALL-E; and text-to-video AI generators such as Sora. [9] [10] [11] [12] Companies such as OpenAI, Anthropic, Microsoft, Google, and Baidu along with numerous smaller companies have developed generative AI models. [7] [13] [14]

Generative AI has utilizes across a large range of industries, consisting of software advancement, healthcare, finance, home entertainment, client service, [15] sales and marketing, [16] art, composing, [17] fashion, [18] and item style. [19] However, issues have actually been raised about the potential misuse of generative AI such as cybercrime, the use of phony news or deepfakes to deceive or control individuals, and the mass replacement of human jobs. [20] [21] Intellectual residential or commercial property law issues also exist around generative designs that are trained on and emulate copyrighted artworks. [22]

Early history

Since its inception, scientists in the field have raised philosophical and ethical arguments about the nature of the human mind and the effects of creating synthetic beings with human-like intelligence; these concerns have actually previously been checked out by myth, fiction and philosophy given that antiquity. [23] The concept of automatic art go back a minimum of to the automata of ancient Greek civilization, where developers such as Daedalus and Hero of Alexandria were referred to as having designed machines efficient in composing text, producing sounds, and playing music. [24] [25] The tradition of innovative automations has actually grown throughout history, exhibited by Maillardet’s robot developed in the early 1800s. [26] Markov chains have long been used to design natural languages since their advancement by Russian mathematician Andrey Markov in the early 20th century. Markov released his first paper on the topic in 1906, [27] [28] and examined the pattern of vowels and consonants in the novel Eugeny Onegin utilizing Markov chains. Once a Markov chain is learned on a text corpus, it can then be utilized as a probabilistic text generator. [29] [30]

Academic synthetic intelligence

The academic discipline of expert system was developed at a research study workshop held at Dartmouth College in 1956 and has actually experienced a number of waves of improvement and optimism in the decades since. [31] Expert system research started in the 1950s with works like Computing Machinery and Intelligence (1950) and the 1956 Dartmouth Summer Research Project on AI. Since the 1950s, artists and researchers have utilized expert system to develop creative works. By the early 1970s, Harold Cohen was developing and exhibiting generative AI works created by AARON, the computer program Cohen created to create paintings. [32]

The terms generative AI preparation or generative preparation were utilized in the 1980s and 1990s to refer to AI planning systems, especially computer-aided procedure preparation, used to generate sequences of actions to reach a specified goal. [33] [34] Generative AI preparation systems used symbolic AI approaches such as state area search and restriction complete satisfaction and were a “fairly fully grown” technology by the early 1990s. They were used to generate crisis action prepare for military use, [35] procedure prepare for making [33] and choice strategies such as in model autonomous spacecraft. [36]

Generative neural internet (2014-2019)

Since its beginning, the field of artificial intelligence utilized both discriminative models and generative models, to model and anticipate data. Beginning in the late 2000s, the development of deep knowing drove progress and research in image category, speech acknowledgment, natural language processing and other tasks. Neural networks in this age were typically trained as discriminative models, due to the trouble of generative modeling. [37]

In 2014, advancements such as the variational autoencoder and generative adversarial network produced the first practical deep neural networks efficient in learning generative models, instead of discriminative ones, for complex data such as images. These deep generative designs were the first to output not just class labels for images but also entire images.

In 2017, the Transformer network made it possible for improvements in generative designs compared to older Long-Short Term Memory designs, [38] causing the first generative pre-trained transformer (GPT), referred to as GPT-1, in 2018. [39] This was followed in 2019 by GPT-2 which demonstrated the ability to generalize unsupervised to various tasks as a Structure model. [40]

The brand-new generative designs presented during this period permitted big neural networks to be trained using not being watched knowing or semi-supervised learning, rather than the supervised knowing common of discriminative designs. Unsupervised learning got rid of the requirement for humans to manually label data, enabling for larger networks to be trained. [41]

Generative AI boom (2020-)

In March 2020, 15. ai, developed by a confidential MIT researcher, was a totally free web application that could generate persuading character voices using very little training information. [42] The platform is credited as the very first mainstream service to popularize AI voice cloning (audio deepfakes) in memes and content production, influencing subsequent developments in voice AI technology. [43] [44]

In 2021, the introduction of DALL-E, a transformer-based pixel generative design, marked an advance in AI-generated imagery. [45] This was followed by the releases of Midjourney and Stable Diffusion in 2022, which further equalized access to high-quality artificial intelligence art development from natural language prompts. [46] These systems demonstrated extraordinary abilities in creating photorealistic images, artwork, and designs based on text descriptions, leading to extensive adoption amongst artists, designers, and the general public.

In late 2022, the general public release of ChatGPT transformed the ease of access and application of generative AI for general-purpose text-based tasks. [47] The system’s capability to participate in natural conversations, generate innovative material, help with coding, and carry out numerous analytical tasks caught worldwide attention and stimulated extensive discussion about AI’s possible influence on work, education, and creativity. [48]

In March 2023, GPT-4’s release represented another dive in generative AI abilities. A group from Microsoft Research controversially argued that it “could reasonably be deemed an early (yet still insufficient) variation of an artificial basic intelligence (AGI) system.” [49] However, this evaluation was objected to by other scholars who preserved that generative AI stayed “still far from reaching the standard of ‘general human intelligence'” as of 2023. [50] Later in 2023, Meta launched ImageBind, an AI model integrating several modalities consisting of text, images, video, thermal information, 3D information, audio, and movement, leading the way for more immersive generative AI applications. [51]

In December 2023, Google unveiled Gemini, a multimodal AI design available in 4 variations: Ultra, Pro, Flash, and Nano. [52] The company incorporated Gemini Pro into its Bard chatbot and announced prepare for “Bard Advanced” powered by the larger Gemini Ultra model. [53] In February 2024, Google combined Bard and Duet AI under the Gemini brand name, releasing a mobile app on Android and integrating the service into the Google app on iOS. [54]

In March 2024, Anthropic released the Claude 3 family of large language models, including Claude 3 Haiku, Sonnet, and Opus. [55] The designs demonstrated considerable enhancements in capabilities across different standards, with Claude 3 Opus significantly exceeding leading models from OpenAI and Google. [56] In June 2024, Anthropic launched Claude 3.5 Sonnet, which showed improved efficiency compared to the larger Claude 3 Opus, particularly in locations such as coding, multistep workflows, and image analysis. [57]

According to a survey by SAS and Coleman Parkes Research, China has actually emerged as a worldwide leader in generative AI adoption, with 83% of Chinese respondents using the innovation, exceeding both the worldwide average of 54% and the U.S. rate of 65%. This leadership is more evidenced by China’s copyright advancements in the field, with a UN report revealing that Chinese entities submitted over 38,000 generative AI patents from 2014 to 2023, substantially going beyond the United States in patent applications. [58]

Modalities

A generative AI system is built by using unsupervised device learning (invoking for example neural network architectures such as generative adversarial networks (GANs), variation autoencoders (VAEs), transformers, or self-supervised device discovering trained on a dataset. The abilities of a generative AI system depend on the technique or kind of the information set utilized. Generative AI can be either unimodal or multimodal; unimodal systems take just one type of input, whereas multimodal systems can take more than one type of input. [59] For instance, one variation of OpenAI’s GPT-4 accepts both text and image inputs. [60]

Text

Generative AI systems trained on words or word tokens consist of GPT-3, GPT-4, GPT-4o, LaMDA, LLaMA, BLOOM, Gemini and others (see List of big language models). They can natural language processing, device translation, and natural language generation and can be used as structure designs for other tasks. [62] Data sets consist of BookCorpus, Wikipedia, and others (see List of text corpora).

Code

In addition to natural language text, large language models can be trained on programs language text, enabling them to create source code for brand-new computer programs. [63] Examples consist of OpenAI Codex and the VS Code fork Cursor. [64]

Images

Producing high-quality visual art is a prominent application of generative AI. [65] Generative AI systems trained on sets of images with text captions consist of Imagen, DALL-E, Midjourney, Adobe Firefly, FLUX.1, Stable Diffusion and others (see Artificial intelligence art, Generative art, and Synthetic media). They are commonly used for text-to-image generation and neural design transfer. [66] Datasets include LAION-5B and others (see List of datasets in computer vision and image processing).

Audio

Generative AI can likewise be trained extensively on audio clips to produce natural-sounding speech synthesis and text-to-speech capabilities. An early leader in this field was 15. ai, released in March 2020, which demonstrated the capability to clone character voices utilizing as low as 15 seconds of training information. [67] The website got prevalent attention for its ability to produce emotionally expressive speech for numerous fictional characters, though it was later on taken offline in 2022 due to copyright concerns. [68] [69] [70] Commercial options subsequently emerged, consisting of ElevenLabs’ context-aware synthesis tools and Meta Platform’s Voicebox. [71]

Generative AI systems such as MusicLM [72] and MusicGen [73] can likewise be trained on the audio waveforms of taped music together with text annotations, in order to produce new musical samples based upon text descriptions such as a soothing violin tune backed by a distorted guitar riff.

Music

Audio deepfakes of lyrics have been created, like the tune Savages, which utilized AI to imitate rapper Jay-Z’s vocals. Music artist’s instrumentals and lyrics are copyrighted however their voices aren’t safeguarded from regenerative AI yet, raising an argument about whether artists should get royalties from audio deepfakes. [74]

Many AI music generators have actually been created that can be produced using a text expression, category options, and looped libraries of bars and riffs. [75]

Video

Generative AI trained on annotated video can produce temporally-coherent, detailed and photorealistic video clips. Examples consist of Sora by OpenAI, [12] Gen-1 and Gen-2 by Runway, [76] and Make-A-Video by Meta Platforms. [77]

Actions

Generative AI can likewise be trained on the movements of a robotic system to generate brand-new trajectories for movement preparation or navigation. For instance, UniPi from Google Research utilizes prompts like “get blue bowl” or “clean plate with yellow sponge” to control motions of a robotic arm. [78] Multimodal “vision-language-action” models such as Google’s RT-2 can perform rudimentary reasoning in response to user prompts and visual input, such as selecting up a toy dinosaur when given the prompt pick up the extinct animal at a table filled with toy animals and other items. [79]

3D modeling

Artificially intelligent computer-aided design (CAD) can utilize text-to-3D, image-to-3D, and video-to-3D to automate 3D modeling. [80] AI-based CAD libraries might likewise be developed using connected open information of schematics and diagrams. [81] AI CAD assistants are utilized as tools to assist streamline workflow. [82]

Software and hardware

Generative AI models are utilized to power chatbot products such as ChatGPT, programs tools such as GitHub Copilot, [83] text-to-image items such as Midjourney, and text-to-video products such as Runway Gen-2. [84] Generative AI features have actually been integrated into a variety of existing commercially available products such as Microsoft Office (Microsoft Copilot), [85] Google Photos, [86] and the Adobe Suite (Adobe Firefly). [87] Many generative AI models are likewise readily available as open-source software application, including Stable Diffusion and the LLaMA [88] language design.

Smaller generative AI models with up to a few billion criteria can work on mobile phones, embedded devices, and desktop computers. For instance, LLaMA-7B (a variation with 7 billion parameters) can work on a Raspberry Pi 4 [89] and one variation of Stable Diffusion can operate on an iPhone 11. [90]

Larger models with tens of billions of criteria can run on laptop computer or desktop computer systems. To achieve an appropriate speed, designs of this size may require accelerators such as the GPU chips produced by NVIDIA and AMD or the Neural Engine included in Apple silicon items. For instance, the 65 billion specification variation of LLaMA can be configured to run on a desktop PC. [91]

The benefits of running generative AI in your area consist of security of privacy and intellectual property, and avoidance of rate restricting and censorship. The subreddit r/LocalLLaMA in particular focuses on using consumer-grade gaming graphics cards [92] through such strategies as compression. That forum is among just two sources Andrej Karpathy trusts for language design criteria. [93] Yann LeCun has actually promoted open-source designs for their worth to vertical applications [94] and for improving AI security. [95]

Language designs with numerous billions of specifications, such as GPT-4 or PaLM, typically run on datacenter computer systems equipped with selections of GPUs (such as NVIDIA’s H100) or AI accelerator chips (such as Google’s TPU). These extremely large models are normally accessed as cloud services over the Internet.

In 2022, the United States New Export Controls on Advanced Computing and Semiconductors to China imposed constraints on exports to China of GPU and AI accelerator chips used for generative AI. [96] Chips such as the NVIDIA A800 [97] and the Biren Technology BR104 [98] were developed to meet the requirements of the sanctions.

There is totally free software on the market efficient in recognizing text created by generative synthetic intelligence (such as GPTZero), as well as images, audio or video coming from it. [99] Potential mitigation strategies for finding generative AI material include digital watermarking, material authentication, information retrieval, and artificial intelligence classifier models. [100] Despite claims of precision, both totally free and paid AI text detectors have actually frequently produced false positives, erroneously implicating students of sending AI-generated work. [101] [102]

Law and guideline

In the United States, a group of business consisting of OpenAI, Alphabet, and Meta signed a voluntary arrangement with the Biden administration in July 2023 to watermark AI-generated material. [103] In October 2023, Executive Order 14110 applied the Defense Production Act to require all US business to report details to the federal government when training particular high-impact AI designs. [104] [105]

In the European Union, the proposed Artificial Intelligence Act includes requirements to disclose copyrighted product used to train generative AI systems, and to identify any AI-generated output as such. [106] [107]

In China, the Interim Measures for the Management of Generative AI Services presented by the Cyberspace Administration of China controls any public-facing generative AI. It includes requirements to watermark created images or videos, policies on training data and label quality, constraints on personal data collection, and a standard that generative AI need to “abide by socialist core worths”. [108] [109]

Copyright

Training with copyrighted content

Generative AI systems such as ChatGPT and Midjourney are trained on large, publicly available datasets that consist of copyrighted works. AI developers have actually argued that such training is secured under reasonable usage, while copyright holders have actually argued that it infringes their rights. [110]

Proponents of fair use training have actually argued that it is a transformative use and does not include making copies of copyrighted works offered to the public. [110] Critics have actually argued that image generators such as Midjourney can create nearly-identical copies of some copyrighted images, [111] which generative AI programs complete with the material they are trained on. [112]

As of 2024, numerous claims related to using copyrighted product in training are continuous. Getty Images has actually sued Stability AI over using its images to train Stable diffusion. [113] Both the Authors Guild and The New York Times have actually taken legal action against Microsoft and OpenAI over the usage of their works to train ChatGPT. [114] [115]

Copyright of AI-generated content

A separate question is whether AI-generated works can get approved for copyright defense. The United States Copyright Office has ruled that works created by expert system without any human input can not be copyrighted, due to the fact that they lack human authorship. [116] However, the office has also started taking public input to determine if these guidelines need to be improved for generative AI. [117]

Concerns

The development of generative AI has raised issues from governments, services, and individuals, resulting in demonstrations, legal actions, calls to pause AI experiments, and actions by several federal governments. In a July 2023 briefing of the United Nations Security Council, Secretary-General António Guterres specified “Generative AI has huge capacity for great and evil at scale”, that AI might “turbocharge global advancement” and contribute in between $10 and $15 trillion to the international economy by 2030, however that its harmful use “might cause horrific levels of death and destruction, extensive injury, and deep mental damage on an unimaginable scale”. [118]

Job losses

From the early days of the development of AI, there have been arguments advanced by ELIZA developer Joseph Weizenbaum and others about whether jobs that can be done by computer systems really ought to be done by them, offered the difference in between computers and human beings, and between quantitative calculations and qualitative, value-based judgements. [120] In April 2023, it was reported that image generation AI has resulted in 70% of the jobs for computer game illustrators in China being lost. [121] [122] In July 2023, developments in generative AI added to the 2023 Hollywood labor disputes. Fran Drescher, president of the Screen Actors Guild, declared that “expert system presents an existential danger to innovative occupations” during the 2023 SAG-AFTRA strike. [123] Voice generation AI has actually been seen as a possible obstacle to the voice acting sector. [124] [125]

The crossway of AI and employment concerns amongst underrepresented groups globally remains a vital facet. While AI assures performance enhancements and skill acquisition, concerns about job displacement and biased recruiting processes persist amongst these groups, as laid out in studies by Fast Company. To take advantage of AI for a more equitable society, proactive steps encompass mitigating predispositions, advocating openness, appreciating privacy and consent, and accepting diverse groups and ethical considerations. Strategies include redirecting policy focus on regulation, inclusive design, and education’s capacity for customized teaching to optimize advantages while minimizing damages. [126]

Racial and gender bias

Generative AI designs can show and amplify any cultural bias present in the underlying data. For example, a language model may presume that physicians and judges are male, and that secretaries or nurses are female, if those biases prevail in the training information. [127] Similarly, an image design triggered with the text “a picture of a CEO” may disproportionately produce pictures of white male CEOs, [128] if trained on a racially biased data set. A variety of approaches for mitigating predisposition have actually been attempted, such as changing input triggers [129] and reweighting training information. [130]

Deepfakes

Deepfakes (a portmanteau of “deep knowing” and “phony” [131] are AI-generated media that take a person in an existing image or video and change them with somebody else’s likeness using artificial neural networks. [132] Deepfakes have amassed extensive attention and concerns for their uses in deepfake celebrity adult videos, vengeance porn, phony news, hoaxes, health disinformation, monetary scams, and concealed foreign election interference. [133] [134] [135] [136] [137] [138] [139] This has generated actions from both industry and government to spot and restrict their use. [140] [141]

In July 2023, the fact-checking business Logically discovered that the popular generative AI designs Midjourney, DALL-E 2 and Stable Diffusion would produce possible disinformation images when prompted to do so, such as pictures of electoral fraud in the United States and Muslim females supporting India’s Hindu nationalist Bharatiya Janata Party. [142] [143]

In April 2024, a paper proposed to use blockchain (distributed ledger technology) to promote “transparency, verifiability, and decentralization in AI development and usage”. [144]

Audio deepfakes

Instances of users abusing software to create questionable statements in the singing design of celebrities, public authorities, and other well-known individuals have actually raised ethical concerns over voice generation AI. [145] [146] [147] [148] [149] [150] In action, companies such as ElevenLabs have actually mentioned that they would work on mitigating prospective abuse through safeguards and identity verification. [151]

Concerns and fandoms have actually spawned from AI-generated music. The exact same software used to clone voices has actually been utilized on well-known musicians’ voices to create tunes that imitate their voices, gaining both tremendous appeal and criticism. [152] [153] [154] Similar techniques have actually likewise been used to create enhanced quality or full-length versions of tunes that have actually been dripped or have yet to be launched. [155]

Generative AI has actually likewise been used to create new digital artist personalities, with some of these receiving sufficient attention to get record deals at major labels. [156] The developers of these virtual artists have actually also faced their fair share of criticism for their personified programs, including backlash for “dehumanizing” an artform, and likewise creating artists which produce unrealistic or unethical appeals to their audiences. [157]

Cybercrime

Generative AI‘s ability to create reasonable fake material has actually been made use of in various kinds of cybercrime, consisting of phishing frauds. [158] Deepfake video and audio have actually been utilized to develop disinformation and fraud. In 2020, former Google click scams czar Shuman Ghosemajumder argued that as soon as deepfake videos end up being perfectly reasonable, they would stop appearing exceptional to viewers, potentially resulting in uncritical approval of false info. [159] Additionally, large language designs and other types of text-generation AI have actually been utilized to create phony evaluations of e-commerce sites to increase ratings. [160] Cybercriminals have produced big language designs focused on scams, consisting of WormGPT and FraudGPT. [161]

A 2023 study showed that generative AI can be susceptible to jailbreaks, reverse psychology and timely injection attacks, allowing enemies to get assist with hazardous demands, such as for crafting social engineering and phishing attacks. [162] Additionally, other researchers have demonstrated that open-source models can be fine-tuned to remove their safety restrictions at low cost. [163]

Reliance on industry giants

Training frontier AI designs requires an enormous quantity of calculating power. Usually just Big Tech companies have the funds to make such financial investments. Smaller start-ups such as Cohere and OpenAI end up purchasing access to information centers from Google and Microsoft respectively. [164]

Energy and environment

Scientists and journalists have actually expressed issues about the environmental impact that the development and release of generative models are having: high CO2 emissions, [165] [166] [167] large quantities of freshwater used for information centers, [168] [169] and high amounts of electrical power use. [170] [166] [171] There is also concern that these effects might increase as these models are included into widely used online search engine such as Google Search and Bing; [170] as chatbots and other applications become more popular; [170] [169] and as designs require to be re-trained. [170]

Proposed mitigation methods consist of factoring prospective environmental expenses prior to design development or information collection, [165] increasing efficiency of data centers to decrease electricity/energy usage, [168] [170] [166] [169] [171] [167] building more effective device learning models, [168] [166] [169] decreasing the number of times that models need to be re-trained, [167] establishing a government-directed framework for auditing the environmental effect of these designs, [168] [167] managing for openness of these designs, [167] controling their energy and water use, [168] motivating scientists to publish data on their designs’ carbon footprint, [170] [167] and increasing the number of subject matter specialists who comprehend both artificial intelligence and environment science. [167]

Content quality

The New York Times specifies slop as comparable to spam: “shoddy or unwanted A.I. content in social networks, art, books and … in search engine result.” [172] Journalists have actually revealed issues about the scale of low-grade produced material with respect to social networks material moderation, [173] the monetary rewards from social networks business to spread out such content, [173] [174] incorrect political messaging, [174] spamming of scientific research paper submissions, [175] increased effort and time to discover higher quality or preferred content on the Internet, [176] the indexing of created content by search engines, [177] and on journalism itself. [178]

A paper released by researchers at Amazon Web Services AI Labs discovered that over 57% of sentences from a sample of over 6 billion sentences from Common Crawl, a photo of websites, were maker translated. Many of these automated translations were viewed as lower quality, particularly for sentences that were translated throughout a minimum of three languages. Many lower-resource languages (ex. Wolof, Xhosa) were equated throughout more languages than higher-resource languages (ex. English, French). [179] [180]

In September 2024, Robyn Speer, the author of wordfreq, an open source database that calculated word frequencies based upon text from the Internet, revealed that she had actually stopped upgrading the information for a number of factors: high expenses for obtaining information from Reddit and Twitter, excessive concentrate on generative AI compared to other methods in the natural language processing community, and that “generative AI has contaminated the information”. [181]

The adoption of generative AI tools caused a surge of AI-generated material across several domains. A study from University College London estimated that in 2023, more than 60,000 scholarly articles-over 1% of all publications-were likely written with LLM support. [182] According to Stanford University’s Institute for Human-Centered AI, approximately 17.5% of freshly published computer technology documents and 16.9% of peer evaluation text now incorporate content created by LLMs. [183]

Visual content follows a comparable trend. Since the launch of DALL-E 2 in 2022, it is approximated that approximately 34 million images have actually been produced daily. Since August 2023, more than 15 billion images had been generated utilizing text-to-image algorithms, with 80% of these produced by models based upon Stable Diffusion. [184]

If AI-generated content is consisted of in new information crawls from the Internet for additional training of AI models, problems in the resulting designs may take place. [185] Training an AI design exclusively on the output of another AI design produces a lower-quality model. Repeating this procedure, where each brand-new model is trained on the previous design’s output, leads to progressive degradation and eventually leads to a “design collapse” after numerous versions. [186] Tests have actually been conducted with pattern recognition of handwritten letters and with images of human faces. [187] As a repercussion, the value of data collected from real human interactions with systems may become progressively important in the existence of LLM-generated content in data crawled from the Internet.

On the other side, synthetic information is typically utilized as an option to information produced by real-world occasions. Such data can be released to validate mathematical models and to train artificial intelligence designs while maintaining user privacy, [188] consisting of for structured data. [189] The approach is not restricted to text generation; image generation has been employed to train computer system vision designs. [190]

Misuse in journalism

In January 2023, Futurism.com broke the story that CNET had been utilizing an undisclosed internal AI tool to compose at least 77 of its stories; after the news broke, CNET posted corrections to 41 of the stories. [191]

In April 2023, the German tabloid Die Aktuelle published a phony AI-generated interview with former racing chauffeur Michael Schumacher, who had not made any public appearances given that 2013 after sustaining a brain injury in a skiing mishap. The story included two possible disclosures: the cover included the line “deceptively genuine”, and the interview included an acknowledgment at the end that it was AI-generated. The editor-in-chief was fired soon thereafter amid the controversy. [192]

Other outlets that have published articles whose material and/or byline have been verified or suspected to be developed by generative AI models – often with false material, errors, and/or non-disclosure of generative AI use – consist of:

– NewsBreak [193] [194]- outlets owned by Arena Group Sports Illustrated [195] TheStreet [195] Men’s Journal [196]
The Columbus Dispatch [198] [199] Reviewed [200] USA Today [201]
Gizmodo [205] Jalopnik [205] A.V. Club [205] [206] Quartz [207]
Bankrate [209]
Yoga Journal [201] Backpacker [201] Clean Eating [201]
Miami Herald [201] Sacramento Bee [201] Tacoma News Tribune [201] The Rock Hill Herald [201] The Modesto Bee [201] Fort Worth Star-Telegram [201] Merced Sun-Star [201] Ledger-Enquirer [201] The Kansas City Star [201] Raleigh News & Observer [217]
PC Magazine [201] Mashable [201] AskMen [201]
Good Housekeeping [201]
People [201] Parents [201] Food & Wine [201] InStyle [201] Real Simple [201] Travel + Leisure [201] Better Homes & Gardens [201] Southern Living [201]
LA Weekly [218] The Village Voice [218]

In May 2024, Futurism noted that a content management system video by AdVon Commerce, who had actually utilized generative AI to produce short articles for a number of the abovementioned outlets, appeared to reveal that they “had actually produced 10s of thousands of posts for more than 150 publishers.” [201]

News broadcasters in Kuwait, Greece, South Korea, India, China and Taiwan have presented news with anchors based on Generative AI models, triggering issues about task losses for human anchors and audience trust in news that has actually historically been affected by parasocial relationships with broadcasters, material developers or social networks influencers. [220] [221] [222] Algorithmically generated anchors have likewise been used by allies of ISIS for their broadcasts. [223]

In 2023, Google apparently pitched a tool to news outlets that claimed to “produce newspaper article” based upon input information provided, such as “details of present events”. Some news company executives who viewed the pitch explained it as” [taking] for given the effort that entered into producing precise and artistic news stories.” [224]

In February 2024, Google launched a program to pay little publishers to write 3 short articles per day utilizing a beta generative AI model. The program does not require the knowledge or authorization of the sites that the publishers are using as sources, nor does it need the released posts to be identified as being produced or helped by these models. [225]

Many defunct news websites (The Hairpin, The Frisky, Apple Daily, Ashland Daily Tidings, Clayton County Register, Southwest Journal) and blog sites (The Unofficial Apple Weblog, iLounge) have actually gone through cybersquatting, with short articles developed by generative AI. [226] [227] [228] [229] [230] [231] [232] [233]

United States Senators Richard Blumenthal and Amy Klobuchar have actually expressed concern that generative AI could have a hazardous influence on regional news. [234] In July 2023, OpenAI partnered with the American Journalism Project to fund local news outlets for try out generative AI, with Axios noting the possibility of generative AI business developing a dependence for these news outlets. [235]

Meta AI, a chatbot based on Llama 3 which summarizes newspaper article, was noted by The Washington Post to copy sentences from those stories without direct attribution and to possibly more decrease the traffic of online news outlets. [236]

In action to prospective risks around the use and abuse of generative AI in journalism and concerns about declining audience trust, outlets worldwide, consisting of publications such as Wired, Associated Press, The Quint, Rappler or The Guardian have actually published guidelines around how they plan to utilize and not use AI and generative AI in their work. [237] [238] [239] [240]

In June 2024, Reuters Institute published their Digital New Report for 2024. In a study of individuals in America and Europe, Reuters Institute reports that 52% and 47% respectively are uncomfortable with news produced by “mostly AI with some human oversight”, and 23% and 15% respectively report being comfy. 42% of Americans and 33% of Europeans reported that they were comfy with news produced by “mainly human with some aid from AI”. The outcomes of worldwide studies reported that individuals were more unpleasant with news topics consisting of politics (46%), criminal activity (43%), and regional news (37%) produced by AI than other news topics. [241]

Computer shows portal

Technology website

Artificial basic intelligence – Kind of AI with wide-ranging abilities
Artificial creativity – Artificial simulation of human imagination
Artificial intelligence art – Visual media created with AI
Artificial life – Discipline
Chatbot – Program that imitates discussion
Computational creativity – Multidisciplinary endeavour
Generative adversarial network – Deep learning approach
Generative pre-trained transformer – Type of big language design
Large language design – Kind of maker learning design
Music and expert system – Usage of expert system to produce music
Generative AI pornography – Explicit material produced by generative AI
Procedural generation – Method in which information is produced algorithmically instead of by hand
Retrieval-augmented generation – Type of information retrieval using LLMs
Stochastic parrot – Term used in artificial intelligence

References

^ Newsom, Gavin; Weber, Shirley N. (September 5, 2023). “Executive Order N-12-23” (PDF). Executive Department, State of California. Archived (PDF) from the original on February 21, 2024. Retrieved September 7, 2023.
^ Pinaya, Walter H. L.; Graham, Mark S.; Kerfoot, Eric; Tudosiu, Petru-Daniel; Dafflon, Jessica; Fernandez, Virginia; Sanchez, Pedro; Wolleb, Julia; da Costa, Pedro F.; Patel, Ashay (2023 ). “Generative AI for Medical Imaging: extending the MONAI Framework”. arXiv:2307.15208 [eess.IV]
^ “What is ChatGPT, DALL-E, and generative AI?”. McKinsey. Retrieved December 14, 2024.
^ “What is generative AI?”. IBM. March 22, 2024.
^ Pasick, Adam (March 27, 2023). “Expert System Glossary: Neural Networks and Other Terms Explained”. The New York City Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the initial on September 1, 2023. Retrieved April 22, 2023.
^ Karpathy, Andrej; Abbeel, Pieter; Brockman, Greg; Chen, Peter; Cheung, Vicki; Duan, Yan; Goodfellow, Ian; Kingma, Durk; Ho, Jonathan; Rein Houthooft; Tim Salimans; John Schulman; Ilya Sutskever; Wojciech Zaremba (June 16, 2016). “Generative models”. OpenAI. Archived from the initial on November 17, 2023. Retrieved March 15, 2023.
^ a b Griffith, Erin; Metz, Cade (January 27, 2023). “Anthropic Said to Be Closing In on $300 Million in New A.I. Funding”. The New York Times. Archived from the original on December 9, 2023. Retrieved March 14, 2023.
^ Lanxon, Nate; Bass, Dina; Davalos, Jackie (March 10, 2023). “A Cheat Sheet to AI Buzzwords and Their Meanings”. Bloomberg News. Archived from the initial on November 17, 2023. Retrieved March 14, 2023.
^ Metz, Cade (March 14, 2023). “OpenAI Plans to Up the Ante in Tech’s A.I. Race”. The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the original on March 31, 2023. Retrieved March 31, 2023.
^ Thoppilan, Romal; De Freitas, Daniel; Hall, Jamie; Shazeer, Noam; Kulshreshtha, Apoorv (January 20, 2022). “LaMDA: Language Models for Dialog Applications”. arXiv:2201.08239 [cs.CL]
^ Roose, Kevin (October 21, 2022). “A Coming-Out Party for Generative A.I., Silicon Valley’s New Craze”. The New York Times. Archived from the initial on February 15, 2023. Retrieved March 14, 2023.
^ a b Metz, Cade (February 15, 2024). “OpenAI Unveils A.I. That Instantly Generates Eye-Popping Videos”. The New York City Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the original on February 15, 2024. Retrieved February 16, 2024.
^ “The race of the AI labs heats up”. The Economist. January 30, 2023. Archived from the original on November 17, 2023. Retrieved March 14, 2023.
^ Yang, June; Gokturk, Burak (March 14, 2023). “Google Cloud brings generative AI to developers, businesses, and federal governments”. Archived from the original on November 17, 2023. Retrieved March 15, 2023.
^ Brynjolfsson, Erik; Li, Danielle; Raymond, Lindsey R. (April 2023), Generative AI at Work (Working Paper), Working Paper Series, doi:10.3386/ w31161, archived from the initial on March 28, 2024, recovered January 21, 2024
^ “Don’t fear an AI-induced jobs apocalypse right now”. The Economist. March 6, 2023. Archived from the original on November 17, 2023. Retrieved March 14, 2023.
^ Coyle, Jake (September 27, 2023). “In Hollywood writers’ fight against AI, humans win (in the meantime)”. AP News. Associated Press. Archived from the original on April 3, 2024. Retrieved January 26, 2024.
^ Harreis, H.; Koullias, T.; Roberts, Roger. “Generative AI: Unlocking the future of style”. Archived from the original on November 17, 2023. Retrieved March 14, 2023.
^ “How Generative AI Can Augment Human Creativity”. Harvard Business Review. June 16, 2023. ISSN 0017-8012. Archived from the initial on June 20, 2023. Retrieved June 20, 2023.
^ Hendrix, Justin (May 16, 2023). “Transcript: Senate Judiciary Subcommittee Hearing on Oversight of AI”. techpolicy.press. Archived from the initial on November 17, 2023. Retrieved May 19, 2023.
^ Simon, Felix M.; Altay, Sacha; Mercier, Hugo (October 18, 2023). “Misinformation refilled? Fears about the impact of generative AI on misinformation are overblown”. Harvard Kennedy School Misinformation Review. doi:10.37016/ mr-2020-127. S2CID 264113883. Archived from the original on November 17, 2023. Retrieved November 16, 2023.
^ “New AI systems hit copyright law”. BBC News. August 1, 2023. Retrieved September 28, 2024.
^ Newquist, H. P. (1994 ). The Brain Makers: Genius, Ego, And Greed In The Quest For Machines That Think. New York: Macmillan/SAMS. pp. 45-53. ISBN 978-0-672-30412-5.
^ Sharkey, Noel (July 4, 2007), A programmable robot from 60 AD, vol. 2611, New Scientist, archived from the original on January 13, 2018, retrieved October 22, 2019
^ Brett, Gerard (July 1954), “The Automata in the Byzantine “Throne of Solomon””, Speculum, 29 (3 ): 477-487, doi:10.2307/ 2846790, ISSN 0038-7134, JSTOR 2846790, S2CID 163031682.
^ kelinich (March 8, 2014). “Maillardet’s Automaton”. The Franklin Institute. Archived from the initial on August 24, 2023. Retrieved August 24, 2023.
^ Grinstead, Charles Miller; Snell, James Laurie (1997 ). Introduction to Probability. American Mathematical Society. pp. 464-466. ISBN 978-0-8218-0749-1.
^ Bremaud, Pierre (March 9, 2013). Markov Chains: Gibbs Fields, Monte Carlo Simulation, and Queues. Springer Science & Business Media. p. ix. ISBN 978-1-4757-3124-8. Archived from the original on March 23, 2017.
^ Hayes, Brian (2013 ). “First Links in the Markov Chain”. American Scientist. 101 (2 ): 92. doi:10.1511/ 2013.101.92. ISSN 0003-0996. Archived from the initial on May 7, 2024. Retrieved September 24, 2023.
^ Fine, Shai; Singer, Yoram; Tishby, Naftali (July 1, 1998). “The Hierarchical Hidden Markov Model: Analysis and Applications”. Artificial intelligence. 32 (1 ): 41-62. doi:10.1023/ A:1007469218079. ISSN 1573-0565. S2CID 3465810.
^ Crevier, Daniel (1993 ). AI: The Tumultuous Look For Artificial Intelligence. New York, New York: BasicBooks. p. 109. ISBN 0-465-02997-3.
^ Bergen, Nathan; Huang, Angela (2023 ). “A Short History of Generative AI” (PDF). Dichotomies: Generative AI: Navigating Towards a Much Better Future (2 ): 4. Archived (PDF) from the original on August 10, 2023. Retrieved August 8, 2023.
^ a b Alting, Leo; Zhang, Hongchao (1989 ). “Computer aided process planning: the advanced survey”. The International Journal of Production Research. 27 (4 ): 553-585. doi:10.1080/ 00207548908942569. Archived from the initial on May 7, 2024. Retrieved October 3, 2023.
^ Chien, Steve (1998 ). “Automated preparation and scheduling for goal-based self-governing spacecraft”. IEEE Intelligent Systems and Their Applications. 13 (5 ): 50-55. doi:10.1109/ 5254.722362.
^ Burstein, Mark H., ed. (1994 ). ARPA/Rome Laboratory Knowledge-based Planning and Scheduling Initiative Workshop Proceedings. The Advanced Research Projects Agency, Department of Defense, and Rome Laboratory, US Flying Force, Griffiss AFB. p. 219. ISBN 155860345X.
^ Pell, Barney; Bernard, Douglas E.; Chien, Steve A.; Gat, Erann; Muscettola, Nicola; Nayak, P. Pandurang; Wagner, Michael D.; Williams, Brian C. (1998 ). Bekey, George A. (ed.). A Self-governing Spacecraft Agent Prototype. Autonomous Robots Volume 5, No. 1. pp. 29-45. Our deliberator is a standard generative AI coordinator based on the HSTS planning framework (Muscettola, 1994), and our control part is a conventional spacecraft attitude control system (Hackney et al. 1993). We likewise add an architectural element clearly devoted to world modeling (the mode identifier), and differentiate in between control and monitoring.
^ Jebara, Tony (2012 ). Machine knowing: discriminative and generative. Vol. 755. Springer Science & Business Media.
^ Cao, Yihan; Li, Siyu; Liu, Yixin; Yan, Zhiling; Dai, Yutong; Yu, Philip S.; Sun, Lichao (March 7, 2023). “A Detailed Survey of AI-Generated Content (AIGC): A History of Generative AI from GAN to ChatGPT”. arXiv:2303.04226 [cs.AI]
^ “finetune-transformer-lm”. GitHub. Archived from the original on May 19, 2023. Retrieved May 19, 2023.
^ Radford, Alec; Wu, Jeffrey; Child, Rewon; Luan, David; Amodei, Dario; Sutskever, Ilya (2019 ). “Language designs are not being watched multitask learners” (PDF). OpenAI Blog.
^ Radford, Alec (June 11, 2018). “Improving language understanding with without supervision knowing”. OpenAI. Retrieved October 6, 2024.
^ Chandraseta, Rionaldi (January 21, 2021). “Generate Your Favourite Characters’ Voice Lines using Machine Learning”. Towards Data Science. Retrieved December 18, 2024.
^ Temitope, Yusuf (December 10, 2024). “15. ai Creator exposes journey from MIT Project to internet phenomenon”. The Guardian. Archived from the initial on December 28, 2024. Retrieved December 25, 2024.
^ Anirudh VK (March 18, 2023). “Deepfakes Are Elevating Meme Culture, But At What Cost?”. Analytics India Magazine. Archived from the original on December 26, 2024. Retrieved December 18, 2024. While AI voice memes have been around in some type because ’15. ai’ introduced in 2020, […] ^ Coldewey, Devin (January 5, 2021). “OpenAI’s DALL-E creates plausible images of actually anything you ask it to”. TechCrunch. Retrieved March 15, 2023.
^ “Stable Diffusion Public Release”. Stability AI. Retrieved March 15, 2023.
^ Lock, Samantha (December 5, 2022). “What is AI chatbot phenomenon ChatGPT and could it change humans?”. The Guardian. Retrieved March 15, 2023.
^ Huang, Haomiao (August 23, 2023). “How ChatGPT turned generative AI into an “anything tool””. Ars Technica. Retrieved September 21, 2024.
^ Bubeck, Sébastien; Chandrasekaran, Varun; Eldan, Ronen; Gehrke, Johannes; Horvitz, Eric; Kamar, Ece; Lee, Peter; Lee, Yin Tat; Li, Yuanzhi; Lundberg, Scott; Nori, Harsha; Palangi, Hamid; Ribeiro, Marco Tulio; Zhang, Yi (March 22, 2023). “Sparks of Artificial General Intelligence: Early explores GPT-4”. arXiv:2303.12712 [cs.CL]
^ Schlagwein, Daniel; Willcocks, Leslie (September 13, 2023). “ChatGPT et al: The Ethics of Using (Generative) Expert System in Research and Science”. Journal of Infotech. 38 (2 ): 232-238. doi:10.1177/ 02683962231200411. S2CID 261753752.
^ “Meta open-sources multisensory AI model that combines 6 types of information”. May 9, 2023. Retrieved March 14, 2024.
^ Kruppa, Miles (December 6, 2023). “Google Announces AI System Gemini After Turmoil at Rival OpenAI”. The Wall Street Journal. ISSN 0099-9660. Archived from the original on December 6, 2023. Retrieved December 6, 2023.
^ Edwards, Benj (December 6, 2023). “Google releases Gemini-a powerful AI design it says can go beyond GPT-4″. Ars Technica. Retrieved December 6, 2023.
^ Metz, Cade (February 8, 2024). “Google Releases Gemini, an A.I.-Driven Chatbot and Voice Assistant”. The New York City Times. Retrieved February 8, 2024.
^ “Introducing the next generation of Claude”. Retrieved March 4, 2024.
^ Nuñez, Michael (March 4, 2024). “Anthropic unveils Claude 3, exceeding GPT-4 and Gemini Ultra in benchmark tests”. Venture Beat. Retrieved April 9, 2024.
^ Pierce, David (June 20, 2024). “Anthropic has a fast new AI design – and a smart brand-new way to engage with chatbots”. The Verge. Retrieved June 22, 2024.
^ Baptista, Eduardo (July 9, 2024). “China leads the world in adoption of generative AI, survey shows”. Reuters. Retrieved July 14, 2024.
^ “A History of Generative AI: From GAN to GPT-4”. March 21, 2023. Archived from the original on June 10, 2023. Retrieved April 28, 2023.
^ “Explainer: What is Generative AI, the technology behind OpenAI’s ChatGPT?”. Reuters. March 17, 2023. Archived from the initial on March 30, 2023. Retrieved March 17, 2023.
^ Roose, Kevin (February 16, 2023). “Bing’s A.I. Chat: ‘I Want to Be Alive.'”. The New York Times. Archived from the initial on April 15, 2023. Retrieved January 30, 2024.
^ Bommasani, R.; Hudson, D. A.; Adeli, E.; Altman, R.; Arora, S.; von Arx, S.; Bernstein, M. S.; Bohg, J.; Bosselut, A; Brunskill, E.; Brynjolfsson, E. (August 16, 2021). “On the chances and dangers of foundation models”. arXiv:2108.07258 [cs.LG]
^ Chen, Ming; Tworek, Jakub; Jun, Hongyu; Yuan, Qinyuan; Pinto, Hanyu Philippe De Oliveira; Kaplan, Jerry; Edwards, Haley; Burda, Yannick; Joseph, Nicholas; Brockman, Greg; Ray, Alvin (July 6, 2021). “Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Code”. arXiv:2107.03374 [cs.LG]
^ “Investing in Cursor”. Andreesen Horowitz.
^ Epstein, Ziv; Hertzmann, Aaron; Akten, Memo; Farid, Hany; Fjeld, Jessica; Frank, Morgan R. ; Groh, Matthew; Herman, Laura; Leach, Neil; Mahari, Robert; Pentland, Alex “Sandy”; Russakovsky, Olga; Schroeder, Hope; Smith, Amy (2023 ). “Art and the science of generative AI”. Science. 380 (6650 ): 1110-1111. arXiv:2306.04141. Bibcode:2023 Sci … 380.1110 E. doi:10.1126/ science.adh4451. PMID 37319193. S2CID 259095707.
^ Ramesh, Aditya; Pavlov, Mikhail; Goh, Gabriel; Gray, Scott; Voss, Chelsea; Radford, Alec; Chen, Mark; Sutskever, Ilya (2021 ). “Zero-shot text-to-image generation”. International Conference on Artificial Intelligence. PMLR. pp. 8821-8831.
^ Chandraseta, Rionaldi (January 21, 2021). “Generate Your Favourite Characters’ Voice Lines utilizing Artificial intelligence”. Towards Data Science. Archived from the original on January 21, 2021. Retrieved December 18, 2024.
^ Temitope, Yusuf (December 10, 2024). “15. ai Creator reveals journey from MIT Project to internet phenomenon”. The Guardian. Archived from the original on December 28, 2024. Retrieved December 25, 2024.
^ Ruppert, Liana (January 18, 2021). “Make Portal’s GLaDOS And Other Beloved Characters Say The Weirdest Things With This App”. Game Informer. Archived from the initial on January 18, 2021. Retrieved December 18, 2024.
^ Kurosawa, Yuki (January 19, 2021). “ゲームキャラ音声読み上げソフト 15. ai 公開中 。 Undertale や Portal のキャラに好きなセリフを言ってもらえる” [Game Character Voice Reading Software “15. ai” Now Available. Get Characters from Undertale and Portal to Say Your Desired Lines] AUTOMATON (in Japanese). Archived from the initial on January 19, 2021. Retrieved December 18, 2024. 英語版ボイスのみなので注意 。; もうひとつ15.aiの大きな特徴として挙げられるのが 、 豊かな感情表現だ 。 [Please note that just English voices are available.; Another significant feature of 15. ai is its abundant emotional expression.] ^ Desai, Saahil (July 17, 2023). “A Voicebot Just Left Me Speechless”. The Atlantic. Archived from the initial on December 8, 2023. Retrieved November 28, 2023.
^ Agostinelli, Andrea; Denk, Timo I.; Borsos, Zalán; Engel, Jesse; Verzetti, Mauro; Caillon, Antoine; Huang, Qingqing; Jansen, Aren; Roberts, Adam; Tagliasacchi, Marco; Sharifi, Matt; Zeghidour, Neil; Frank, Christian (January 26, 2023). “MusicLM: Generating Music From Text”. arXiv:2301.11325 [cs.SD]
^ Dalugdug, Mandy (August 3, 2023). “Meta in June said that it used 20,000 hours of certified music to train MusicGen, which consisted of 10,000 “high-quality” licensed music tracks. At the time, Meta’s researchers laid out in a paper the ethical challenges that they came across around the advancement of generative AI models like MusicGen”. Archived from the original on August 15, 2023.
^ “Jay-Z’s Delaware manufacturer triggers argument over AI rights”. Archived from the original on February 27, 2024. Retrieved February 27, 2024.
^ “10 “Best” AI Music Generators (April 2024) – Unite.AI”. October 19, 2022. Archived from the original on January 29, 2024. Retrieved February 27, 2024.
^ Metz, Cade (April 4, 2023). “Instant Videos Could Represent the Next Leap in A.I. Technology”. The New York City Times. Archived from the original on April 5, 2023. Retrieved April 5, 2023.
^ Wong, Queenie (September 29, 2022). “Facebook Parent Meta’s AI Tool Can Create Artsy Videos From Text”. cnet.com. Archived from the initial on April 5, 2023. Retrieved April 4, 2023.
^ Yang, Sherry; Du, Yilun (April 12, 2023). “UniPi: Learning universal policies via text-guided video generation”. Google Research, Brain Team. Google AI Blog. Archived from the initial on May 24, 2023.
^ Brohan, Anthony (2023 ). “RT-2: Vision-Language-Action Models Transfer Web Knowledge to Robotic Control”. arXiv:2307.15818 [cs.RO]
^ Abdullahi, Aminu (November 17, 2023). “10 Best Artificial Intelligence (AI) 3D Generators”. eWEEK. Archived from the initial on May 7, 2024. Retrieved February 6, 2024.
^ “Slash CAD design build times with brand-new AI-driven part production methodology|GlobalSpec”. Archived from the original on January 23, 2024. Retrieved February 6, 2024.
^ “The Role of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in the CAD Industry”. March 22, 2023. Archived from the initial on February 9, 2024. Retrieved February 6, 2024.
^ Sabin, Sam (June 30, 2023). “GitHub has a vision to make code more protected by style”. Axios Codebook. Archived from the original on August 15, 2023. Retrieved August 15, 2023.
^ Vincent, James (March 20, 2023). “Text-to-video AI inches closer as startup Runway reveals brand-new model”. The Verge. Archived from the original on September 27, 2023. Retrieved August 15, 2023. is the next frontier for generative AI, though current output is primary. Runway says it’ll be making its new generative video design, Gen-2, offered to users in ‘the coming weeks.’
^ Vanian, Jonathan (March 16, 2023). “Microsoft adds OpenAI technology to Word and Excel”. CNBC. Archived from the initial on August 15, 2023. Retrieved August 15, 2023. Microsoft is bringing generative artificial intelligence technologies such as the popular ChatGPT talking app to its Microsoft 365 suite of company software … the brand-new A.I. functions, dubbed Copilot, will be offered in a few of the business’s most popular service apps, including Word, PowerPoint and Excel.
^ Wilson, Mark (August 15, 2023). “The app’s Memories function simply got a huge upgrade”. TechRadar. Archived from the initial on August 15, 2023. The Google Photos app is getting a revamped, AI-powered Memories feature … you’ll be able to utilize generative AI to come up with some suggested names like “a desert experience”.
^ Sullivan, Laurie (May 23, 2023). “Adobe Adds Generative AI To Photoshop”. MediaPost. Archived from the initial on August 15, 2023. Retrieved August 15, 2023. Generative expert system (AI) will turn into one of the most important functions for innovative designers and marketers. Adobe on Tuesday revealed a Generative Fill feature in Photoshop to bring Firefly’s AI capabilities into style.
^ Michael Nuñez (July 19, 2023). “LLaMA 2: How to gain access to and use Meta’s flexible open-source chatbot right now”. VentureBeat. Archived from the initial on November 3, 2023. Retrieved August 15, 2023. If you want to run LLaMA 2 on your own maker or customize the code, you can download it directly from Hugging Face, a leading platform for sharing AI designs.
^ Pounder, Les (March 25, 2023). “How To Create Your Own AI Chatbot Server With Raspberry Pi 4”. Archived from the original on August 15, 2023. Retrieved August 15, 2023. Using a Pi 4 with 8GB of RAM, you can produce a ChatGPT-like server based upon LLaMA.
^ Kemper, Jonathan (November 10, 2022). “”Draw Things” App brings Stable Diffusion to the iPhone”. The Decoder. Archived from the initial on August 15, 2023. Retrieved August 15, 2023. Draw Things is an app that brings Stable Diffusion to the iPhone. The AI images are created locally, so you don’t require an Internet connection.
^ Witt, Allan (July 7, 2023). “Best Computer to Run LLaMA AI Model in the house (GPU, CPU, RAM, SSD)”. Archived from the initial on August 15, 2023. Retrieved August 15, 2023. To run LLaMA design in your home, you will need a computer system build with an effective GPU that can manage the large amount of information and calculation needed for inferencing.
^ Westover, Brian (September 28, 2023). “Who Needs ChatGPT? How to Run Your Own Free and Private AI Chatbot”. Ziff Davis. Archived from the original on January 7, 2024. Retrieved January 7, 2024.
^ @karpathy (December 20, 2023). “I pretty much only trust two LLM evals right now” (Tweet) – via Twitter.
^ @ylecun (January 5, 2024). “Nabla’s shift from ChatGPT to open source LLMs …” (Tweet) – via Twitter.
^ @ylecun (November 1, 2023). “Open source platforms * increase * security and security” (Tweet) – through Twitter.
^ Nellis, Stephen; Lee, Jane (September 1, 2022). “U.S. authorities order Nvidia to stop sales of leading AI chips to China”. Reuters. Archived from the initial on August 15, 2023. Retrieved August 15, 2023.
^ Shilov, Anton (May 7, 2023). “Nvidia’s Chinese A800 GPU’s Performance Revealed”. Tom’s Hardware. Archived from the initial on May 7, 2024. Retrieved August 15, 2023. the A800 operates at 70% of the speed of A100 GPUs while adhering to strict U.S. export requirements that limit just how much processing power Nvidia can sell.
^ Patel, Dylan (October 24, 2022). “How China’s Biren Is Attempting To Evade US Sanctions”. Archived from the initial on August 15, 2023. Retrieved August 15, 2023.
^ “5 complimentary software to identify phony AI-generated images” (in Italian). October 28, 2023. Archived from the initial on October 29, 2023. Retrieved October 29, 2023.
^ “Detecting AI fingerprints: A guide to watermarking and beyond”. Brookings Institution. January 4, 2024. Archived from the original on September 3, 2024. Retrieved September 5, 2024.
^ Fowler, Geoffrey (April 3, 2023). “We tested a brand-new ChatGPT-detector for teachers. It flagged an innocent trainee”. washingtonpost.com. Archived from the original on March 28, 2024. Retrieved February 6, 2024.
^ Fowler, Geoffrey (June 2, 2023). “Detecting AI might be impossible. That’s a huge problem for teachers”. washingtonpost.com. Archived from the initial on June 3, 2023. Retrieved February 6, 2024.
^ Bartz, Diane; Hu, Krystal (July 21, 2023). “OpenAI, Google, others pledge to watermark AI material for security, White House says”. Reuters. Archived from the initial on July 27, 2023.
^ “FACT SHEET: President Biden Issues Executive Order on Safe, Secure, and Trustworthy Artificial Intelligence”. The White House. October 30, 2023. Archived from the original on January 30, 2024. Retrieved January 30, 2024.
^ Burt, Andrew (October 31, 2023). “3 Obstacles to Regulating Generative AI”. Harvard Business Review. ISSN 0017-8012. Archived from the original on February 17, 2024. Retrieved February 17, 2024.
^ “EU AI Act: very first regulation on expert system”. European Parliament. August 6, 2023. Retrieved September 13, 2024.
^ Chee, Foo Yun; Mukherjee, Supantha (June 14, 2023). “EU lawmakers vote for tougher AI guidelines as draft moves to last stage”. Reuters. Archived from the original on July 27, 2023. Retrieved July 26, 2023.
^ Ye, Josh (July 13, 2023). “China states generative AI guidelines to use just to products for the general public”. Reuters. Archived from the initial on July 27, 2023. Retrieved July 13, 2023.
^ “生成式人工智能服务管理暂行办法”. July 13, 2023. Archived from the original on July 27, 2023. Retrieved July 27, 2023.
^ a b “Generative Artificial Intelligence and Copyright Law”. Congressional Research Service. LSB10922. September 29, 2023. Archived from the initial on March 22, 2024. Retrieved January 30, 2024.
^ Thompson, Stuart (January 25, 2024). “We Asked A.I. to Create the Joker. It Generated a Copyrighted Image”. The New York Times. Archived from the original on January 25, 2024. Retrieved January 26, 2024.
^ Hadero, Haleluya; Bauder, David (December 27, 2023). “The New york city Times sues OpenAI and Microsoft for using its stories to train chatbots”. Associated Press News. AP News. Archived from the initial on December 27, 2023. Retrieved April 13, 2023.
^ O’Brien, Matt (September 25, 2023). “Photo giant Getty took a leading AI image-maker to court. Now it’s also welcoming the technology”. AP NEWS. Associated Press. Archived from the original on January 30, 2024. Retrieved January 30, 2024.
^ Barber, Gregory (December 9, 2023). “The Generative AI Copyright Fight Is Just Getting Started”. Wired. Archived from the initial on January 19, 2024. Retrieved January 19, 2024.
^ Bruell, Alexandra (December 27, 2023). “New York Times Sues Microsoft and OpenAI, Alleging Copyright Infringement”. Wall Street Journal. Archived from the initial on January 18, 2024. Retrieved January 19, 2024.
^ Brittain, Blake (August 21, 2023). “AI-generated art can not receive copyrights, US court states”. Reuters. Archived from the original on January 20, 2024. Retrieved January 19, 2024.
^ David, Emilla (August 29, 2023). “US Copyright Office wants to hear what individuals consider AI and copyright”. The Verge. Archived from the original on January 19, 2024. Retrieved January 19, 2024.
^ “Secretary-General’s remarks to the Security Council on Expert System”. un.org. July 18, 2023. Archived from the initial on July 28, 2023. Retrieved July 27, 2023.
^ “The Writers Strike Is Taking a Stand on AI”. Time. May 4, 2023. Archived from the initial on June 11, 2023. Retrieved June 11, 2023.
^ Tarnoff, Ben (August 4, 2023). “Lessons from Eliza”. The Guardian Weekly. pp. 34-39.
^ Zhou, Viola (April 11, 2023). “AI is already taking video game illustrators’ jobs in China”. Rest of World. Archived from the initial on August 13, 2023. Retrieved August 17, 2023.
^ Carter, Justin (April 11, 2023). “China’s video game art market reportedly annihilated by growing AI utilize”. Game Developer. Archived from the initial on August 17, 2023. Retrieved August 17, 2023.
^ Collier, Kevin (July 14, 2023). “Actors vs. AI: Strike brings focus to emerging use of innovative tech”. NBC News. Archived from the initial on July 20, 2023. Retrieved July 21, 2023. SAG-AFTRA has actually signed up with the Writer’s [sic] Guild of America in requiring an agreement that clearly demands AI guidelines to protect writers and the works they develop. … The future of generative expert system in Hollywood-and how it can be utilized to change labor-has become a vital sticking point for actors going on strike. In a news conference Thursday, Fran Drescher, president of the Screen Actors Guild-American Federation of Television and Radio Artists (more commonly known as SAG-AFTRA), declared that ‘artificial intelligence presents an existential threat to creative professions, and all actors and performers are worthy of agreement language that protects them from having their identity and talent exploited without permission and pay.’
^ Wiggers, Kyle (August 22, 2023). “ElevenLabs’ voice-generating tools launch out of beta”. TechCrunch. Archived from the initial on November 28, 2023. Retrieved September 25, 2023.
^ Shrivastava, Rashi. “‘Keep Your Paws Off My Voice’: Voice Actors Worry Generative AI Will Steal Their Livelihoods”. Forbes. Archived from the original on December 2, 2023. Retrieved November 28, 2023.
^ Gupta, Shalene (October 31, 2023). “Underrepresented groups in countries around the globe are stressed over AI being a hazard to tasks”. Fast Company. Archived from the original on December 8, 2023. Retrieved December 8, 2023.
^ Rachel Gordon (March 3, 2023). “Large language designs are prejudiced. Can logic help conserve them?”. MIT CSAIL. Archived from the initial on January 23, 2024. Retrieved January 26, 2024.
^ OpenAI (July 18, 2022). “Reducing predisposition and enhancing safety in DALL · E 2”. OpenAI. Archived from the original on January 26, 2024. Retrieved January 26, 2024.
^ Jake Traylor (July 27, 2022). “No quick repair: How OpenAI’s DALL · E 2 illustrated the challenges of predisposition in AI”. NBC News. Archived from the initial on January 26, 2024. Retrieved January 26, 2024.
^ “DALL · E 2 pre-training mitigations”. OpenAI. June 28, 2022. Archived from the original on January 26, 2024. Retrieved January 26, 2024.
^ Brandon, John (February 16, 2018). “Terrifying state-of-the-art pornography: Creepy ‘deepfake’ videos are on the rise”. Fox News. Archived from the original on June 15, 2018. Retrieved February 20, 2018.
^ Cole, Samantha (January 24, 2018). “We Are Truly Fucked: Everyone Is Making AI-Generated Fake Porn Now”. Vice. Archived from the original on September 7, 2019. Retrieved May 4, 2019.
^ “What Are Deepfakes & Why the Future of Porn is Terrifying”. Highsnobiety. February 20, 2018. Archived from the original on July 14, 2021. Retrieved February 20, 2018.
^ “Experts fear face switching tech could start a global showdown”. The Outline. Archived from the original on January 16, 2020. Retrieved February 28, 2018.
^ Roose, Kevin (March 4, 2018). “Here Come the Fake Videos, Too”. The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the initial on June 18, 2019. Retrieved March 24, 2018.
^ Schreyer, Marco; Sattarov, Timur; Reimer, Bernd; Borth, Damian (2019 ). “Adversarial Learning of Deepfakes in Accounting”. arXiv:1910.03810 [cs.LG]
^ Menz, Bradley (2024 ). “Health Disinformation Use Case Highlighting the Urgent Need for Artificial Intelligence Vigilance”. JAMA Internal Medicine. 184 (1 ): 92-96. doi:10.1001/ jamainternmed.2023.5947. PMID 37955873. S2CID 265148637. Archived from the original on February 4, 2024. Retrieved February 4, 2024.
^ Chalfant, Morgan (March 6, 2024). “U.S. braces for foreign interference in 2024 election”. Semafor. Archived from the original on March 11, 2024. Retrieved March 6, 2024.
^ Menn, Joseph (September 23, 2024). “Russia, Iran utilize AI to boost anti-U.S. impact projects, officials say”. The Washington Post. ISSN 0190-8286. Archived from the original on September 24, 2024. Retrieved September 23, 2024.
^ “Join the Deepfake Detection Challenge (DFDC)”. deepfakedetectionchallenge.ai. Archived from the initial on January 12, 2020. Retrieved November 8, 2019.
^ Clarke, Yvette D. (June 28, 2019). “H.R. 3230 – 116th Congress (2019-2020): Defending Each and Every Person from False Appearances by Keeping Exploitation Subject to Accountability Act of 2019”. www.congress.gov. Archived from the initial on December 17, 2019. Retrieved October 16, 2019.
^ “New Research Reveals Scale of Threat Posed by AI-generated Images on 2024 Elections”. Logically. July 27, 2023. Archived from the initial on October 3, 2023. Retrieved July 6, 2024.
^ Lawton, Graham (September 12, 2023). “Disinformation wars: The battle versus fake news in the age of AI“. New Scientist. Retrieved July 5, 2024.
^ Brewer, Jordan; Patel, Dhru; Kim, Dennie; Murray, Alex (April 12, 2024). “Navigating the challenges of generative technologies: Proposing the combination of artificial intelligence and blockchain”. Business Horizons. 67 (5 ): 525-535. doi:10.1016/ j.bushor.2024.04.011. ISSN 0007-6813.
^ “People Are Still Terrible: AI Voice-Cloning Tool Misused for Deepfake Celeb Clips”. PCMag Middle East. January 31, 2023. Archived from the initial on December 25, 2023. Retrieved July 25, 2023.
^ “The generative A.I. software race has actually started”. Fortune. Archived from the initial on March 25, 2023. Retrieved February 3, 2023.
^ Milmo, Dan; Hern, Alex (May 20, 2023). “Elections in UK and US at danger from AI-driven disinformation, say experts”. The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Archived from the original on November 16, 2023. Retrieved July 25, 2023.
^ “Seeing is thinking? Global scramble to deal with deepfakes”. news.yahoo.com. Archived from the initial on February 3, 2023. Retrieved February 3, 2023.
^ Vincent, James (January 31, 2023). “4chan users embrace AI voice clone tool to generate star hatespeech”. The Verge. Archived from the original on December 3, 2023. Retrieved February 3, 2023.
^ Thompson, Stuart A. (March 12, 2023). “Making Deepfakes Gets Cheaper and Easier Thanks to A.I.” The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the original on October 29, 2023. Retrieved July 25, 2023.
^ “A new AI voice tool is currently being abused to make deepfake celebrity audio clips”. Engadget. January 31, 2023. Archived from the original on October 10, 2023. Retrieved February 3, 2023.
^ Gee, Andre (April 20, 2023). “Even If AI-Generated Rap Songs Go Viral Doesn’t Mean They’re Good”. Rolling Stone. Archived from the initial on January 2, 2024. Retrieved December 6, 2023.
^ Coscarelli, Joe (April 19, 2023). “An A.I. Hit of Fake ‘Drake’ and ‘The Weeknd’ Rattles the Music World”. The New York Times. Archived from the original on May 15, 2023. Retrieved December 5, 2023.
^ Lippiello, Emily; Smith, Nathan; Pereira, Ivan (November 3, 2023). “AI songs that imitate popular artists raising alarms in the music market”. ABC News. Archived from the initial on December 6, 2023. Retrieved December 6, 2023.
^ Skelton, Eric. “Fans Are Using Expert System to Turn Rap Snippets Into Full Songs”. Complex. Archived from the original on January 2, 2024. Retrieved December 6, 2023.
^ Marr, Bernard. “Virtual Influencer Noonoouri Lands Record Deal: Is She The Future Of Music?”. Forbes. Archived from the initial on December 4, 2023. Retrieved December 6, 2023.
^ Thaler, Shannon (September 8, 2023). “Warner Music signs first-ever record handle AI pop star”. New York City Post. Archived from the initial on December 15, 2023. Retrieved December 6, 2023.
^ Sjouwerman, Stu (December 26, 2022). “Deepfakes: Get ready for phishing 2.0”. Fast Company. Archived from the original on July 31, 2023. Retrieved July 31, 2023.
^ Sonnemaker, Tyler. “As social media platforms brace for the incoming wave of deepfakes, Google’s former ‘fraud czar’ predicts the most significant danger is that deepfakes will ultimately end up being uninteresting”. Business Insider. Archived from the original on April 14, 2021. Retrieved July 31, 2023.
^ Collinson, Patrick (July 15, 2023). “Fake reviews: can we trust what we checked out online as use of AI takes off?”. The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Archived from the initial on November 22, 2023. Retrieved December 6, 2023.
^ “After WormGPT, FraudGPT Emerges to Help Scammers Steal Your Data”. PCMAG. July 25, 2023. Archived from the initial on July 31, 2023. Retrieved July 31, 2023.
^ Gupta, Maanak; Akiri, Charankumar; Aryal, Kshitiz; Parker, Eli; Praharaj, Lopamudra (2023 ). “From ChatGPT to ThreatGPT: Impact of Generative AI in Cybersecurity and Privacy”. IEEE Access. 11: 80218-80245. arXiv:2307.00691. Bibcode:2023 IEEEA..1180218 G. doi:10.1109/ ACCESS.2023.3300381. S2CID 259316122.
^ Piper, Kelsey (February 2, 2024). “Should we make our most effective AI designs open source to all?”. Vox. Retrieved January 13, 2025.
^ Metz, Cade (July 10, 2023). “In the Age of A.I., Tech’s Little Guys Need Big Friends”. New York City Times.
^ a b Bender, Emily M.; Gebru, Timnit; McMillan-Major, Angelina; Shmitchell, Shmargaret (March 1, 2021). “On the Dangers of Stochastic Parrots: Can Language Models be Too Big?”. Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency. FAccT ’21. New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery. pp. 610-623. doi:10.1145/ 3442188.3445922. ISBN 978-1-4503-8309-7.
^ a b c d “AI is an energy hog. This is what it indicates for environment change”. MIT Technology Review. May 23, 2024. Archived from the initial on August 20, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ a b c d e f g Dhar, Payal (August 1, 2020). “The carbon impact of synthetic intelligence”. Nature Machine Intelligence. 2 (8 ): 423-425. doi:10.1038/ s42256-020-0219-9. ISSN 2522-5839. Archived from the original on August 14, 2024.
^ a b c d e Crawford, Kate (February 20, 2024). “Generative AI’s environmental expenses are skyrocketing – and mainly secret”. Nature. 626 (8000 ): 693. Bibcode:2024 Natur.626..693 C. doi:10.1038/ d41586-024-00478-x. PMID 38378831. Archived from the original on August 22, 2024.
^ a b c d Rogers, Reece. “AI’s Energy Demands Run out Control. Welcome to the Internet’s Hyper-Consumption Era”. Wired. ISSN 1059-1028. Archived from the original on August 14, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ a b c d e f Saenko, Kate (May 23, 2023). “Is generative AI bad for the environment? A computer system scientist describes the carbon footprint of ChatGPT and its cousins”. The Conversation. Archived from the original on July 1, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ a b Lohr, Steve (August 26, 2024). “Will A.I. Ruin the Planet or Save the Planet?”. The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the initial on August 26, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ Hoffman, Benjamin (June 11, 2024). “First Came ‘Spam.’ Now, With A.I., We have actually Got ‘Slop'”. The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the initial on August 26, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ a b “Investigation Finds Actual Source of All That AI Slop on Facebook”. Futurism. August 10, 2024. Archived from the original on August 15, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ a b Warzel, Charlie (August 21, 2024). “The MAGA Aesthetic Is AI Slop”. The Atlantic. Archived from the original on August 25, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ Edwards, Benj (August 14, 2024). “Research AI design unexpectedly tries to customize its own code to extend runtime”. Ars Technica. Archived from the original on August 24, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ Hern, Alex; Milmo, Dan (May 19, 2024). “Spam, scrap … slop? The most current wave of AI behind the ‘zombie internet'”. The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Archived from the initial on August 26, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ Cox, Joseph (January 18, 2024). “Google News Is Boosting Garbage AI-Generated Articles”. 404 Media. Archived from the initial on June 13, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ “Beloved Local Newspapers Fired Staffers, Then Started Running AI Slop”. Futurism. July 31, 2024. Archived from the initial on August 12, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ Thompson, Brian; Dhaliwal, Mehak; Frisch, Peter; Domhan, Tobias; Federico, Marcello (August 2024). Ku, Lun-Wei; Martins, Andre; Srikumar, Vivek (eds.). “A Shocking Amount of the Web is Machine Translated: Insights from Multi-Way Parallelism”. Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics ACL 2024. Bangkok, Thailand and virtual conference: Association for Computational Linguistics: 1763-1775. arXiv:2401.05749. doi:10.18653/ v1/2024. findings-acl.103.
^ Roscoe, Jules (January 17, 2024). “A ‘Shocking’ Amount of the Web Is Already AI-Translated Trash, Scientists Determine”. VICE. Archived from the original on July 1, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ Koebler, Jason (September 19, 2024). “Project Analyzing Human Language Usage Shuts Down Because ‘Generative AI Has Polluted the Data'”. 404 Media. Archived from the original on September 19, 2024. Retrieved September 20, 2024. While there has always been spam on the web and in the datasets that Wordfreq used, “it was manageable and frequently identifiable. Large language designs produce text that masquerades as real language with objective behind it, despite the fact that there is none, and their output turn up all over,” she composed. She provides the example that ChatGPT overuses the word “dive,” in a method that individuals do not, which has shaken off the frequency of this specific word.
^ Gray, Andrew (March 24, 2024). “ChatGPT “contamination”: estimating the occurrence of LLMs in the academic literature”. arXiv:2403.16887 [cs.DL]
^ Kannan, Prabha (May 13, 2024). “How Much Research Is Being Written by Large Language Models?”. Human-Centered Artificial Intelligence. Stanford University. Retrieved August 16, 2024.
^ Valyaeva, Alina (August 15, 2023). “AI Image Statistics for 2024: How Much Content Was Created by AI”. Everypixel Journal. Retrieved August 16, 2024.
^ Shumailov, Ilia; Shumaylov, Zakhar; Zhao, Yiren; Papernot, Nicolas; Anderson, Ross; Gal, Yarin (July 2024). “AI models collapse when trained on recursively produced information”. Nature. 631 (8022 ): 755-759. Bibcode:2024 Natur.631..755 S. doi:10.1038/ s41586-024-07566-y. PMC 11269175. PMID 39048682.
^ Bhatia, Aatish (August 26, 2024). “When A.I.’s Output Is a Danger to A.I. Itself”. The New York City Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ “Self-Consuming Generative Models Freak”. ICLR. 2024.
^ Owen, Sean (April 12, 2023). “Synthetic Data for Better Artificial Intelligence”. databricks.com. Archived from the original on January 3, 2024. Retrieved January 4, 2024.
^ Sharma, Himanshu (July 11, 2023). “Synthetic Data Platforms: Unlocking the Power of Generative AI for Structured Data”. kdnuggets.com. Archived from the initial on January 3, 2024. Retrieved January 4, 2024.
^ Stöckl, Andreas (November 2, 2022). “Evaluating an Artificial Image Dataset Generated with Stable Diffusion”. arXiv:2211.01777 [cs.CV]
^ Roth, Emma (January 25, 2023). “CNET found mistakes in more than half of its AI-written stories”. The Verge. Archived from the original on November 6, 2023. Retrieved June 17, 2023.
^ “A magazine touted Michael Schumacher’s very first interview in years. It was actually AI”. NPR. April 28, 2023. Archived from the initial on June 17, 2023. Retrieved June 17, 2023.
^ Al-Sibai, Noor (January 3, 2024). “Police Say AI-Generated Article About Local Murder Is “Entirely” Comprised”. Futurism. Archived from the original on January 5, 2024. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ “NewsBreak: Most downloaded US news app has Chinese roots and ‘composes fiction’ using AI”. Reuters. June 5, 2024. Archived from the initial on June 6, 2024. Retrieved June 7, 2024.
^ a b Harrison, Maggie (November 27, 2023). “Sports Illustrated Published Articles by Fake, AI-Generated Writers”. Futurism. Archived from the initial on December 15, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Christian, Jon (February 9, 2023). “Magazine Publishes Serious Errors in First AI-Generated Health Article”. Futurism. Archived from the initial on December 26, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Schneider, Jaron (December 14, 2023). “B&H Photo Published an AI-Generated Guide Written by a Fake Person”. PetaPixel. Archived from the original on January 4, 2024. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Harrison, Maggie (August 29, 2023). “USA Today Owner Pauses AI Articles After Butchering Sports Coverage”. Futurism. Archived from the initial on January 4, 2024. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Buchanan, Tyler (August 28, 2023). “Dispatch stops briefly AI sports composing program”. Axios. Archived from the initial on January 1, 2024. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Sommer, Will (October 26, 2023). “Mysterious bylines appeared on an USA Today website. Did these authors exist?”. Washington Post. ISSN 0190-8286. Archived from the initial on October 26, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z aa ab air conditioner “Meet AdVon, the AI-Powered Content Monster Infecting the Media Industry”. Futurism. May 8, 2024. Archived from the initial on June 4, 2024. Retrieved June 8, 2024.
^ O’Sullivan, Donie; Gordon, Allison (November 2, 2023). “How Microsoft’s AI is making a mess of the news|CNN Business”. CNN. Archived from the initial on November 2, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Meade, Amanda (July 31, 2023). “News Corp using AI to produce 3,000 Australian local news stories a week”. The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Archived from the initial on December 2, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Tangermann, Victor (June 30, 2023). “Gizmodo Staff Furious After Site Announces Relocate To AI Content”. Futurism. Archived from the original on December 6, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ a b c Kafka, Peter (July 18, 2023). “Coming to your internet, whether you like it or not: More AI-generated stories”. Vox. Archived from the initial on July 18, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Landymore, Frank; Christian, Jon (September 13, 2023). “The A.V. Club’s AI-Generated Articles Are Copying Directly From IMDb”. Futurism. Archived from the original on December 6, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Stiaplame, Nordiisk (January 28, 2025). “Quartz Is Publishing AI-Generated Articles Based on Other AI Slop, Along With Warning They May Be Filled With Errors”. Futurism. Archived from the original on January 29, 2025. Retrieved January 30, 2025.
^ Carroll, Rory (May 14, 2023). “Irish Times apologises for scam AI post about females’s use of phony tan”. The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Archived from the initial on May 14, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Christian, Jon (February 1, 2023). “CNET Sister Site Restarts AI Articles, Immediately Publishes Idiotic Error”. Futurism. Archived from the initial on November 27, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Al-Sibai, Noor; Christian, Jon (March 30, 2023). “BuzzFeed Is Quietly Publishing Entire AI-Generated Articles”. Futurism. Archived from the original on December 6, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ “Newsweek is making generative AI a component in its newsroom”. Nieman Lab. April 17, 2024. Archived from the initial on May 15, 2024. Retrieved May 24, 2024.
^ “What’s in a byline? For Hoodline’s AI-generated regional news, whatever – and absolutely nothing”. Nieman Lab. June 3, 2024. Archived from the original on June 6, 2024. Retrieved June 8, 2024.
^ “AI-generated news is here from S.F.-based Hoodline. What does that mean for standard publishers?”. San Francisco Chronicle. May 8, 2024. Archived from the initial on June 5, 2024. Retrieved June 7, 2024.
^ Gold, Hadas (May 30, 2024). “A national network of local news websites is releasing AI-written posts under fake bylines. Experts are raising alarm”. CNN. Archived from the initial on June 6, 2024. Retrieved June 8, 2024.
^ “Wyoming press reporter captured using expert system to create phony quotes and stories”. Associated Press. August 14, 2024. Archived from the initial on August 24, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ “Cosmos Magazine publishes AI-generated articles, drawing criticism from journalists, co-founders”. ABC News. August 7, 2024. Archived from the original on August 24, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ “AI-generated posts are penetrating significant news publications”. National Public Radio. May 16, 2024. Archived from the original on June 19, 2024. Retrieved July 8, 2024.
^ a b c Knibbs, Kate (July 30, 2024). “Zombie Alt-Weeklies Are Stuffed With AI Slop About OnlyFans”. Wired. Archived from the original on August 11, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ “Apple says it will update AI function after inaccurate news notifies”. The Guardian. January 7, 2025. Archived from the original on January 14, 2025. Retrieved January 14, 2025.
^ “TV channels are utilizing AI-generated speakers to read the news. The concern is, will we trust them?”. BBC News. January 26, 2024. Archived from the initial on January 26, 2024. Retrieved May 24, 2024.
^ Tait, Amelia (October 20, 2023). “‘Here is the news. You can’t stop us’: AI anchor Zae-In grants us an interview”. The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Archived from the original on January 28, 2024. Retrieved May 24, 2024.
^ Kuo, Lily (November 9, 2018). “World’s first AI news anchor unveiled in China”. The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Archived from the initial on February 20, 2024. Retrieved May 24, 2024.
^ “These ISIS news anchors are AI phonies. Their propaganda is real”. Washington Post. May 17, 2024. Archived from the initial on May 19, 2024. Retrieved May 24, 2024.
^ Mullin, Benjamin; Grant, Nico (July 20, 2023). “Google Tests A.I. Tool That Is Able to Write News Articles”. The New York City Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the original on May 16, 2024. Retrieved May 24, 2024.
^ Stenberg, Mark (February 27, 2024). “Google Is Paying Publishers Five-Figure Sums to Test an Unreleased Gen AI Platform”. Adweek. Archived from the initial on March 9, 2024. Retrieved April 17, 2024.
^ Knibbs, Kate (February 7, 2024). “Confessions of an AI Clickbait Kingpin”. Wired. ISSN 1059-1028. Archived from the original on May 18, 2024. Retrieved May 24, 2024.
^ Knibbs, Kate (January 26, 2024). “How Beloved Indie Blog ‘The Hairpin’ Turned Into an AI Clickbait Farm”. Wired. ISSN 1059-1028. Archived from the initial on April 14, 2024. Retrieved May 24, 2024.
^ Koebler, Jason (July 9, 2024). “A Beloved Tech Blog Is Now Publishing AI Articles Under the Names of Its Old Human Staff”. 404 Media. Archived from the initial on July 12, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ Hollister, Sean (July 10, 2024). “Early Apple tech bloggers are shocked to discover their name and work have been AI-zombified”. The Verge. Archived from the initial on July 12, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ “AI slop is already attacking Oregon’s local journalism”. Oregon Public Broadcasting. December 9, 2024. Archived from the initial on December 9, 2024. Retrieved December 10, 2024.
^ Knibbs, Kate (February 26, 2024). “How a Small Iowa Newspaper’s Website Became an AI-Generated Clickbait Factory”. Wired. ISSN 1059-1028. Archived from the original on February 26, 2024. Retrieved December 10, 2024.
^ Koebler, Jason; Cole, Samantha; Maiberg, Emanuel; Cox, Joseph (January 26, 2024). “We Need Your Email Address”. 404 Media. Archived from the original on December 2, 2024. Retrieved December 10, 2024.
^ “Meet the Serbian Businessman/DJ Who Runs the Zombie AI Southwest Journal – Racket”. Racket. February 16, 2024. Archived from the original on November 13, 2024. Retrieved December 10, 2024.
^ Lima-Strong, Cristiano (January 11, 2024). “Senators warn AI could lead to ‘damage’ of local news”. Washington Post. ISSN 0190-8286. Archived from the original on January 11, 2024. Retrieved May 24, 2024.
^ “OpenAI strikes $5 million-plus local news offer”. Axios. July 18, 2023. Archived from the original on July 19, 2023. Retrieved May 24, 2024.
^ Kelly, Heather (May 22, 2024). “Meta left news. Now the business’s using it for AI content”. Washington Post. ISSN 0190-8286. Archived from the initial on May 22, 2024. Retrieved May 24, 2024.
^ “How WIRED Will Use Generative AI Tools”. Wired. Archived from the original on December 30, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Barrett, Amanda (November 15, 2018). “Standards around generative AI”. Associated Press. Archived from the original on September 23, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Viner, Katharine; Bateson, Anna (June 16, 2023). “The Guardian’s approach to generative AI”. The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Archived from the original on January 3, 2024. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Becker, K. B.; Simon, F. M.; Crum, C. (2023 ). “Policies in parallel? A comparative research study of journalistic AI policies in 52 global news organisations”. pp. 8-9. doi:10.31235/ osf.io/ c4af9.
^ Newman, Nic; Fletcher, Richard; Robertson, Craig T.; Arguedas, Amy Ross; Nielsen, Rasmus Fleis (June 2024). “Digital News Report 2024” (PDF). Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism.